Harry Wendelken vs David Quayle Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Wendelken vs D. Quayle

Harry Wendelken
GBR
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
25
-
Height
-
323
C. Rank
0
323
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

David Quayle
GBR
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
25
-
Height
-
323
C. Rank
0
323
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Wendelken 1 - 0 Quayle
They have played 2 sets in total, with Harry Wendelken winning 2 and David Quayle winning 0. The last match between Harry Wendelken and David Quayle was at the M25 Aldershot, 14-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Harry Wendelken getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wendelken | 1 |
| Quayle | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Aldershot(08-14-24)
Harry Wendelken
6
6
David Quayle
4
4
H. Wendelken vs D. Quayle H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.19% (177-138) | Career Total W/L | 39.22% (60-93) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Wendelken vs D. Quayle Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harry Wendelken has won 42.56% of points on their second serve, while David Quayle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harry Wendelken, in recent form, has won 42.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Quayle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Harry Wendelken has saved 55.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Quayle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Harry Wendelken has won 64.38% of matches played (W/L 47/26), with David Quayle winning 40.00% (W/L 4/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Harry Wendelken has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 72/50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 8/12). David Quayle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 40/51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 2/9).
- Player level: In the last year, Harry Wendelken has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as David Quayle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 4/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Harry Wendelken winning 1 times and David Quayle being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Harry Wendelken winning 2 and David Quayle winning 0.
- The last match between Harry Wendelken and David Quayle was at the M25 Aldershot, 14-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Harry Wendelken getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harry Wendelken has played against opponents with an average rank of 372.95 while David Quayle has played against players with an average rank of 189.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harry Wendelken has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Quayle has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Harry Wendelken has converted 39.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Quayle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Harry Wendelken vs David Quayle Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Wendelken vs D. Quayle H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:11:0 | Average Match Time | 2:11:0 |
| 56% (44/79) | 1st Serve % | 63% (46/73) |
| 66% (29/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (25/46) |
| 46% (16/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 23% (3/13) |
| 51% (37/73) | Return Points Win % | 43% (34/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wendelken 54%, Quayle 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wendelken 54%, Quayle 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Wendelken 58%, Quayle 63%.
H. Wendelken Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 7-6(1) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
D. Quayle Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 1-6 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 5-1 ret. | ||

H. Wendelken vs D. Quayle Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.19% (177/138) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.22% (60/93) |
| 55.42% (404/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.27% (137/195) |
| 52.36% (3627/3300) | Games Win/Loss | 47.35% (1529/1700) |
| 56.86% (87/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.96% (40/51) |
| 52.63% (10/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 58.54% (72/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.96% (17/29) |
| 40.00% (8/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 974 | Aces Total | 203 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 661 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1:37:53 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 407.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 244.22 |
| 58% (11018/19131) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3406/5634) |
| 67% (7423/11018) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2241/3406) |
| 52% (4197/8113) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1043/2228) |
| 44% (864/1979) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (201/489) |
| 40% (7779/19291) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2059/5495) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.00% (27/23) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.82% (150/114) | Futures W/L | 39.22% (60/93) |
| 56% (175/312) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (57/150) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (45/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (16/34) |
| 49% (48/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 83% (175/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (67/56) |
| 17% (175/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (67/11) |
| 22% (140/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (86/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
18:25
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal